Yes. California law allows survivors to sue a school district civilly for childhood sexual abuse, most often for negligent supervision, negligent hiring or retention, or failures tied to mandated reporting. For abuse on or after January 1, 2024, there is no time limit; for earlier abuse, the deadline is generally age 40 or five years from discovery, whichever is later.
Yes. A California school district can be sued civilly for childhood sexual abuse, usually for failing to protect a student through poor supervision, hiring or response to warnings. These claims generally do not require filing a government claim first, and deadlines depend on when the abuse happened.
Many survivors do not connect what happened to them with a legal claim until years later, and California law is written with that in mind.
What Makes a School District Claim Different from a Private Lawsuit
A public school district is a government body. In California, lawsuits against government bodies are shaped by the Government Claims Act, the name given to the division of the Government Code that begins at Gov. Code § 810. A California school district is generally treated as a local public entity under that Act, so procedural rules apply that would not apply to a private school, a church or an individual.
"Claim presentation" means delivering a formal written notice to the public entity before suing it. For most injury claims against a California public entity, that step must come before filing a lawsuit. Childhood sexual assault claims are a major exception, following AB 218 in 2019 and later amendments.
Whether a defendant is a local entity, such as a school district, or the State of California itself matters, because the rules are not identical. Charter and private schools raise their own questions; our broader guide to school sexual abuse in California covers those settings.
The Government Claims Act and What It Requires
Under the general rules of the Government Claims Act, beginning at Gov. Code § 900, a person with an injury claim against a public entity typically presents a written claim to that entity before filing suit.
The ordinary deadlines are short. Under Gov. Code § 911.2, a claim for injury to a person "shall be presented ... not later than six months after the accrual of the cause of action." Under Gov. Code § 912.4, the entity has 45 days to act on the claim, and if it does nothing, the claim is treated as rejected. Under Gov. Code § 945.6, after written notice of rejection is given, the lawsuit generally must be filed within six months.
For childhood sexual assault, those steps generally do not apply. California law exempts claims brought under Code of Civil Procedure § 340.1 from the claim-presentation requirement for local public entities, and a local entity cannot substitute its own claim procedure. AB 218 removed an earlier date limit on this exemption, retroactively.
The claim-presentation rules still matter for other kinds of claims, and for claims against the State, where the exemption reaches only conduct on or after January 1, 2024.
How AB 218 Changed the Statute of Limitations for Childhood Sexual Assault
The deadline for a childhood sexual assault claim in California is set by Code of Civil Procedure § 340.1. Which version applies depends on when the abuse happened.
Abuse on or after January 1, 2024. After AB 452, § 340.1(a) provides: "There is no time limit for the commencement of any of the following actions for recovery of damages suffered as a result of childhood sexual assault." That includes an action "against any person or entity who owed a duty of care to the plaintiff, if a wrongful or negligent act by that person or entity was a legal cause of the childhood sexual assault." The no-time-limit rule reaches only abuse occurring on and after January 1, 2024.
Abuse on or before December 31, 2023. These claims are governed by § 340.1 as it read on December 31, 2023, the AB 218 rule. A survivor generally has until age 40, or five years from discovering that a psychological injury was caused by the abuse, whichever is later. AB 452 did not revive any claim that had already expired.
The lookback window. AB 218 opened a three-year revival window beginning January 1, 2020, for claims that had expired under older deadlines. It closed on December 31, 2022.
Treble damages. Section 340.1(b) allows a survivor who proves a cover up to recover "up to treble damages." The statute defines a cover up as "a concerted effort to hide evidence relating to childhood sexual assault." The California Supreme Court has held that this provision does not apply against public entities such as school districts.
Certificates of merit. A plaintiff who is 40 or older when filing must submit certificates of merit, signed by the attorney and a licensed mental health practitioner who has not treated the survivor, stating there is a reasonable basis for the claim.
Deadlines are explained further in our guide to the California sexual abuse statute of limitations.
