If a therapist had sexual contact with you while treating you, California law treats that as misconduct by the therapist, not something you agreed to or caused. It can be a crime, a ground for losing a license, and the basis of a civil claim for money damages against the therapist and, in some cases, the clinic or practice that employed them.
What Therapist Sexual Abuse Means Under California Law
California treats sexual contact between a therapist and a patient as exploitation of a professional role. The central statute is California Business and Professions Code § 729. It applies to a physician and surgeon, psychotherapist, research psychoanalyst, student research psychoanalyst, or alcohol and drug abuse counselor, and to anyone holding themselves out as one of those professionals.
Under § 729, the offense is committed when that professional engages in sexual intercourse, sodomy, oral copulation, or sexual contact with a patient or client. It also reaches a former patient or client when the treatment relationship was ended primarily so the sexual contact could happen. The statute calls this "sexual exploitation" and declares it a public offense, which means it can be prosecuted as a crime.
The word "psychotherapist" covers a wide range of licenses. Psychologists are licensed by the California Board of Psychology. Marriage and family therapists (MFTs), licensed clinical social workers (LCSWs), and licensed professional clinical counselors (LPCCs) are licensed by the California Board of Behavioral Sciences. Psychiatrists are physicians, licensed by the Medical Board of California. Trainees, associates, and registered assistants in these fields are included in the statutory definition as well.
A therapist holds a fiduciary role (a position of trust in which the professional is required to act in the patient's interest, not their own), and therapy commonly produces transference, the strong feelings a patient may develop toward a therapist.
This is why "consent" works differently here than in ordinary life. Section 729 does not make the offense depend on whether the patient agreed. The offense is defined by the relationship: a professional, a patient, and sexual contact. The statute's narrow exception concerns a former patient who was properly referred to an independent professional for treatment, and it does not turn on the patient's agreement. A patient who felt they went along with it, or who believed at the time that it was a genuine relationship, has not waived the protection the law gives them.
California Statutes That Prohibit Therapist Sexual Misconduct
Three separate systems apply to this conduct in California: criminal law, civil law, and professional licensing. Each runs on its own track.
Criminal law. Section 729, described above, is the criminal statute. The penalties it sets out depend on the circumstances of the case. A prosecutor, not the survivor, decides whether to bring charges.
A related patient-protection rule. Business and Professions Code § 728 applies when a patient tells a later psychotherapist that a previous psychotherapist had sexual contact with them. The later therapist, or their employer, must give the patient a state brochure describing the rights of, and remedies for, patients in that situation, and must discuss it with them. Failure to do so is unprofessional conduct. Section 728 also contains the statutory list of who counts as a "psychotherapist," which other statutes borrow.
Civil harassment in professional relationships. Civil Code § 51.9 creates a civil claim for sexual harassment within a business, service, or professional relationship. It expressly lists the relationship with a physician, psychotherapist, or dentist, using the § 728 definition of psychotherapist. Other listed relationships include teachers, attorneys, and others.
Licensing discipline. Each licensing statute allows the relevant board to deny, suspend, or revoke a license for "unprofessional conduct." Under § 2960, the Board of Psychology may discipline psychologists. Under § 4982, the Board of Behavioral Sciences may discipline MFTs. Under § 4992.3, it may discipline LCSWs. Each list of unprofessional conduct is non-exhaustive and includes, among other grounds, conviction of a crime substantially related to the profession; § 2960 also separately lists any act of sexual abuse or sexual misconduct, and sexual behavior or sexual contact with a client or former client.
These tracks are independent. A civil claim does not require a conviction, and a decision by prosecutors not to file charges does not end a civil claim. The differences between the two court systems are covered in more depth in our guide to civil vs. criminal cases.
How the Licensing Boards Respond to Complaints in California
A board complaint is an administrative process. Which board handles it depends on the license:
- The California Board of Psychology handles complaints against licensed psychologists.
- The California Board of Behavioral Sciences handles complaints against MFTs, LCSWs, and LPCCs.
- The Medical Board of California handles complaints against psychiatrists and other physicians.
After a complaint is filed, a board may investigate. Possible outcomes include suspension, revocation, conditions placed on a license, and a public record of discipline. The board decides the outcome; the person who complained is a witness in that process, not a party to it.
A board cannot award the survivor money for the harm they suffered. Compensation requires a civil claim in court. A survivor does not need an attorney to file a board complaint, while a civil lawsuit is typically handled with counsel.
